becausebirds:

avianawareness:

Door no stop us from loves and scritches

Doors can’t stop our love.

becausebirds:

avianawareness:

Door no stop us from loves and scritches

Doors can’t stop our love.

4,098 notes

Anonymous said: I used to buy into the idea that Andy was less dangerous because he was living with his parents, but I've found information on Jeanine's site his mother was a known horse thief and liar and now he claims his father blamed the Jimmy Doohan fiasco on not being able to research rumors on the internet, but Abbey has proven that's a lie and the internet including forms Andy has admitted to using existed back to the 80s. Have you ever considered it might be a barrel of bad apples? A con dynasty?

ceirdwenfc:

arse-moriendi:

ceirdwenfc:

arse-moriendi:

delwynmarch:

ceirdwenfc:

So as usual anyone who doesn’t share your experience is lying.

Nope. But when you say factually false stuff, then yeah, you’re lying. Examples:

"[in 1994] you couldn’t walk into a store and buy one and you had to wait weeks, if not months for them to build one and ship it"

Factually false.

"1988. Folders, files, binders, boxes and briefcases. No disks"

Factually false.

"you needed to code, use DOS, Basic, etc. You had to be the level of a computer genius to use it."

Factually false.

"The first Windows (XP) that was for the consumer market and home use didn’t become available until 2001.”

Factually very, very false!

"People did not use computers the way they do today."

Factually false.

When you pretend to educate someone on “how it was”, and you pepper falsehoods throughout it, you don’t then get to complain when people tell you that you got it wrong.

The people that take your expert opinion and call it fact are in fact a mob because they don’t think for themselves

Oh really? “They don’t think for themselves”? Please tell me: how do you know that? You on top of the “I wouldn’t dare tell other people what their own experiences are like” high horse, do tell me how you know that the people who believe me do so because they don’t think for themselves.

Hypocrite.

inexplicably trust your bad analysis based on false assumptions and hyperbole

My analyses are based on what Andy writes and says. On FACTS. You may disagree with my analyses of these facts, but you don’t get to pretend they are not actually based on facts.

because the one thing you don’t grasp and can’t seem to understand is that individuals have different experiences from you,

And what YOU don’t seem to grasp, is that when someone has already TWICE created textbook cults in which they horribly abused people, they do NOT deserve a third chance.

But yeah, sure, I’m just a horrible person who doesn’t realise that poor Andy is the woobiest woobie who ever woobied, as well as the speshulest snowflake who ever speshuled.

Sure.

"The first Windows (XP) that was for the consumer market and home use didn’t become available until 2001.”

Wow, whut? whucking fut? I don’t even—

We had Windows since there was a Windows, and before that, DOS! We used computers in the same capacity we do today, it was just more keystrokes!

this is literally the stupidest lie I’ve come across in a long time. “the sky is actually green today” would have been less audacious and taken longer to disprove! How do you even begin to think of this as fact???

Did you have trouble following the link?

How could you possibly state that something I FUCKING DID IN MY OWN LIFE is a lie.

Talk about reaching.

I said we had DOS.

[[/MORE]]

Hi there,

are you going to refute any of the other points(such as windows 95 et all being commercially available for home use)?

your silence speaks volumes.

My silence speaks that dinner with my family is much more enjoyable than responding to you.

I already refuted that in my original post when I said there is a difference between what was available and what people had due to their money and their circumstances.

The people that included my family were who I was talking about.

I also analysed Andy’s family based on personally knowing them, something you guys relish from people who don’t.

I think you guys don’t understand the concept of anecdotal and opinion.

Ah good, you’re back. let tally it up:

My silence speaks that dinner with my family is much more enjoyable than responding to you.

Once again invoking the image of your family as a form of emotional manipulation. Don’t think, feel!

I already refuted that in my original post when I said there is a difference between what was available and what people had due to their money and their circumstances.

And other people have readily pointed out how many holes were in that analysis. 

The people that included my family were who I was talking about.

Yet you felt okay about generalizing about other peoples experiences, how does that work?

I also analysed Andy’s family based on personally knowing them, something you guys relish from people who don’t.

I am going to come right out and ask this: have you actually consulted with Andy’s family? As in, directly, not through Andy? 

ceirdwenfc:

HOLY MOTHER OF WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!

WHERE DO I BEGIN?

I’ve got to hand it to you anon; I thought I had seen everything, but this….I have no words, and you should consider yourself lucky for that.

Two questions:

1. How old are you?

2. Have you actually read Jeanine’s live journal? The whole thing? Before she deleted half of it? Because anyone who has would say not to take it with a grain of salt, but with a barrelful.

Read More

I think you guys don’t understand the concept of anecdotal and opinion.

Do you ever get tired of just blurting stuff out without any factual basis? I realize you’re trying to defend someone, but this is just downright embarrassing.

As it is, I realize this conversation has just distracted from a much more interesting matter: the fact that the guy who Andy started a collection for will not be usuing the plane ticket, leaving a question of the money collected.  It was fun catching up, but I’m all out of time for you.

21 notes

pixelartus:

Triworld - The Floating Island

Pixel Artist: Mrmo Tarius

Source: pixeljoint.com

12 notes

unexplained-events:

Last Moments

Vic Morrow and two children, My-Ca Dinh Le (age 7), and Renee Shin-Yi Chen (age 6) died on the set of Twilight Zone: The Movie after a stunt helicopter fell on them.

In the scene, Morrow and the two kids, were supposed to be escaping from a pursuing helicopter when the pyrotechnic explosions damaged it and caused it to crash. The three instantly died.

Also, Landis invited the jury who acquitted him to a screening party of his latest movie.

344 notes

Where Did The Rum Go?

delwynmarch:

I’m gonna get back to that computer history nonsense, but in the meantime, it seems to me that Andy is trying to get away with something much more important.

I mean, he posted this while we were busy telling Cfc off for rewriting computer history. Let me quote the whole thing:

We Should Go To The Zoo, It’s Free!

Although Rhys won’t be able to make it - he’s grateful for people’s generous help, but he’s had a volunteer opportunity he can’t refuse we’re still planning birthday shenanigans/DC Con reunion at the National Zoo on Saturday, July 26. Look for the Staff of the Overlord (you’ll know it when you see it) at the main entrance at 10:00am.  RSVPing to this post or 757-634-7914 is also greatly appreciated. 

(emphasis mine)

Erm, okay, but then WHAT ABOUT THE MONEY THAT WAS BEING COLLECTED FOR RHYS’ PLANE TICKET?

You know, just wondering…

Yeah, this computer stuff is very convenient timing.

11 notes

hideback:

Enzo Bifoli (Italian, 1882-1965)

Chapel Design (never built), 1915

66 notes

eartheld:

helicine:

how do i get this picture of myself tumblr famous

i want this tattooed on my back

eartheld:

helicine:

how do i get this picture of myself tumblr famous

i want this tattooed on my back

7,820 notes

  • DC: Wonder Woman is too difficult to find a movie audience for-
  • Marvel: YO YOU LIKE BLACK WIDOW? HERE SHE IS IN THE NEXT CAPTAIN AMERICA MOVIE WITH A TON OF SCREENTIME AND MAJOR ASSKICKING SKILLS
  • DC: We can't allow the lesbians in Batwoman to get married in the comic, sorry.
  • Marvel: HEY GUESS WHAT WE'RE GONNA FEATURE A GAY WEDDING ON THE COVER OF AN X-MEN ISSUE
  • DC: The new direction for storytelling needs to be dark, gritty, mature and cynical.
  • Marvel: DUDE CHECK IT OUT LOKI GOES SPEED DATING IS THAT NOT THE BEST SHIT EVER
  • DC: After years of rumors, the Superman/Batman movie is finally coming, but with a new actor and suit for Batman and MAYBE a cameo from Wonder Woman.
  • Marvel: PHASE 2 MOTHERFUCKERS EVERYONE IS IN EVERYONE'S MOVIE AND THERE AIN'T NO STOPPIN US NOW
  • DC: We can try to add maybe one or two 'people of color' to our lineup...maybe...
  • Marvel: NEW MS MARVEL THAT'S MUSLIM AMERICAN, BITCHES.
  • DC: We feel no problem with Batman's vengeful personality being like wet cardboard.
  • Marvel: NEW LATINA GHOST RIDER WHO SEEKS VENGEANCE WHILE TAKING HIS AWEET LIL BRO FOR ICE CREAM
  • DC: We can't mention any superhero titles in our movies, that's ridiculous.
  • Marvel: FUCK YEAH YOU WANT A RACOON VOICED BY BRADLEY COOPER WITH A GIANT GUN? YOU WANT VIN DIESEL PLAYING A TREE? AMY FUCKING POND PLAYING A SEXY BALD SPACE PIRATE? HERE YOU FUCKERS GO
  • DC: Our fanbase is mostly white males, I'm sure our focus is-
  • Marvel: NEW SHE HULK LINE WHERE SHE GOES TO COURT THEN SAVES NEW YORK
  • DC: Wait-
  • Marvel: NEW FEMALE THOR
  • DC: I didn't-
  • Marvel: NEW BLACK CAPTAIN AMERICA
  • Marvel: TAKE ALL THIS COOL SHIT MARVEL BE OUTIE
  • Marvel: PEACE

28,920 notes